Everyone at some point in the past must have dropped bookmarks. Remember the times prior to Google? Bookmarking was lots of useful. What if that awesome site you discovered the other day wasn't bookmarked and got forgotten? Searching for it could easily be a fruitless mission. But there came Google, and most of the new users that were now arriving and still arrive to the web today may even not be aware of the existence of bookmarks, that tool of the browser that lets them remind useful or largely accessed links. Why should they? They have Google, the thing that reads their thoughts and never presents anything but what they want in the first result.

Of course bookmarks are still useful and the proof of that is, for example, Del.icio.us, but for a totally different purpose, the purpose of being a warehouse of links we think we may find useful in the future. We are talking about website launching here and even things like the Bookmarks toolbar in your browser are getting pretty useless by now with the recent improvements on Google, namely Google Search Wiki and Google Labs' experiment KeyboardShortcuts.

 

Firefox's Bookmarks Toolbar
 

 

Let me first talk about Keyboard Shortcuts and what an awesome google labs feature it is. It's a known fact in computers that keyboards are much more faster to work with than the mouse. This experiment brings exactly that. The ability to be able to mouselessly scroll through the search results with keys 'J' and 'K'. But the best part is in the fact that the first result is always highlighted by default and a simple Return over a search result will get to that website. You won't loose that second of getting to the mouse (which will probably take itself most of total time wasted if you're not using a touchpad on a laptop), moving it and clicking on the first result. Your search will get where it's supposed to be in a split second. 

This would all mean little if Google had attributed a key to the "I'm feeling lucky button" besides the return to the usual search. That way, searches done for website launching would be direct, and faster.

But you can still improve a little more with what is currently available, and another good thing is Google Search Wiki. With it you can add or remove results from a certain query, make your own websites the first on google (if not) and thus faster accessed. But why are we still typing all that text to get to a website, if Google Search Wiki lets us make any query a direct path to the result we defined? Why not start making our own aliases like searching on google for "tc", and right after the appearance of the results, simply pressing Return with the keyboard shortcut experiment to get to TechCrunch instead of TC Electronic, Teachers College or ThomsonCenter who could mean nothing to you. All with a faster than anything "tc" + Return + Return on google.

 

Adding TechCrunch has a valid result for 'tc'

 

This is what I've been recently thinking, and decided to do, but this usage of Google has a website launcher, and our tweaking of its own tools to give us faster access to the websites we want is problematic. Google has not yet confirmed if the search Wiki choices of the users will ever have any influence in the global results, but if they ever do, search could be compromised with our urge to faster and faster access to what matters to us but to anyone else.

 

TechCrunch has the first result for tc

 

Anyway, I think still very few people are aware of the productivity boost they can have by using these tools, so I thought I better pass the word.




Some months ago it was big news for OpenID. Yahoo was the first big player to announce the YahooID system as a valid OpenID provider, a crucial step that brought some long desired support from major players to the movement. Some weeks ago, Microsoft did the same with their Live accounts, and Google could only follow.

Awesome, right? Well, no. In fact, all that these companies are doing is marketing OpenID as one of those features that everyone claps at, but few stop to realize it means nothing to the movement.

Let's think. Although I already had an OpenID at myopenid.net, I now have my GoogleID has an OpenID, great. Where can I sign in with it? Surely at Flickr from Yahoo, which is an OpenID supporter, right? Actually, no. Well, perhaps on Live Maps this OpenID may be useful. Wrong again. So, what does it mean to me, the OpenID user, to have so many major companies endorsing the system? Zero.

Please, stop trying to turn every existing ID into an OpenID, what we want is not that. We end up having all our previous ID's being all valid OpenIDs, for usage on the same all small sites. Start giving some utility to the feature you're giving us!




 
 
Being a Google apps user by default, I doubted that any new online maps service would grab my attention. This was till Microsoft Live Maps came and I heard news about the deal they made with the Portuguese Geographic Institute, which gave them (and to Google) high-defenition images of the whole country.

The difference is just astonishing. It really made me wish Google was a bit faster in updating the now old-fashioned images of Portugal that it has. But what really made me play around with Live Maps was their new feature "Bird's Eye", which displays images with a slight inclination and with the possibility of rotation for seeing from another angle. Sure Google has street view, eye alt, 3D view and all that stuff, but hardly any of those is really helpful. The first will take a crazy amount of time for being available worldwide, and even by that time, it still will display a pretty useless view of the streets. The second, eye alt, I don't even know what is supposed to be, since is just a option for seeing worse what you already have. It might make more sense in 3D view, but even that, in my opinion, had a bad approach by rendering computer-made images of the buildings as a supposed real view of the planet. If I wanted a maps system which was like a CoD4 map I would ask.

With Bird's Eye Microsoft made it simple and stupid, but it's far better than any of the existent alternatives.



Go to Blog